Skip to content
MMake Prompt AI Get Started
Home > ChatGPT Guide > /codereview
Custom prompt shortcut / Software Development

/codereview — ChatGPT Prompt Guide

Explore the /codereview custom ChatGPT prompt shortcut with a practical template, examples, and review steps. Learn how to refine outputs for your workflow.

What does /codereview do?

Purpose: Review a CSV-import pull request for a contact manager.

This is a custom prompt convention, not a built-in or official ChatGPT slash command. Entering the slash text alone does not guarantee that ChatGPT will invoke a special tool. Use the complete structured prompt below or configure your own app to interpret this shortcut.

Key decision for this workflow

Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures.

Copy-ready task brief

/codereview Objective: Review a CSV-import pull request for a contact manager. Inputs: Patch diff, input fixtures, file-size limits, and error-handling expectations. Deliverable: Severity-ranked review comments with reproduction cases and suggested fixes.

Reusable prompt template

/codereview Objective: Review a CSV-import pull request for a contact manager. Available materials: Patch diff, input fixtures, file-size limits, and error-handling expectations. Required output: Severity-ranked review comments with reproduction cases and suggested fixes. Acceptance test: Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures. Boundary: Avoid asserting a vulnerability without a reproducible path; distinguish security issues from maintainability. Return the requested deliverable first, then a brief verification checklist and any unresolved questions.

How to use this shortcut

  1. Collect the source inputs: Patch diff, input fixtures, file-size limits, and error-handling expectations.
  2. Run /codereview with the copy-ready task brief above.
  3. Request the concrete output: Severity-ranked review comments with reproduction cases and suggested fixes.
  4. Check the result: Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures.

Quality checks and limitations

Acceptance criteria: Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures. Limitation: Avoid asserting a vulnerability without a reproducible path; distinguish security issues from maintainability.

Related tools and learning

Continue with the 35 prompt generators, the technical AI Guides, and the Image Guides for deeper examples.

/code/debug/refactor/codeaudit/conversion/abtesting

Worked example and expected output

Input materials: Patch diff, input fixtures, file-size limits, and error-handling expectations.

Requested result: Severity-ranked review comments with reproduction cases and suggested fixes.

Acceptance test: Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures.

Practical case study: Review a Python CSV importer

Starting brief: Code parses uploaded CSV into customer records and currently logs full rows.

Expected deliverable: Prioritize input validation, memory use, logging redaction and unit-test gaps.

Quality gate: Avoid asserting vulnerabilities without seeing the implementation.

/codereview
Task: Review a Python CSV importer.
Input: Code parses uploaded CSV into customer records and currently logs full rows.
Deliverable: Prioritize input validation, memory use, logging redaction and unit-test gaps.
Review: Avoid asserting vulnerabilities without seeing the implementation.

Field workflow: inputs, decisions, and validation

When to use this shortcut: Review a CSV-import pull request for a contact manager.

What to provide: Patch diff, input fixtures, file-size limits, and error-handling expectations.

What to request: Severity-ranked review comments with reproduction cases and suggested fixes.

Practical method: Test quoted commas, Unicode, duplicate rows, formula-like cells, oversized files, and partial failures.

Important limitation: Avoid asserting a vulnerability without a reproducible path; distinguish security issues from maintainability.

Frequently asked questions

Is /codereview an official ChatGPT command? No. It is a reusable custom shorthand from this catalog. Does it work without a plugin? You can copy the full prompt into an assistant; automatic slash-command routing requires application logic. Can the output be trusted without review? No. Review accuracy, safety, and suitability before use.

Worked scenario and review

Scenario: Review a pull request that adds CSV import to a contact manager.

Expected deliverable: Check parsing, file size limits, injection risks, tests and user-facing errors.

Verification: Distinguish blockers from optional improvements.